跳到正文
Jones Ray

ScholarPulse 日报 2026-06-21

2026-06-21 学术简报:2 篇。AutoPass通过证据引导的LLM代理框架实现编译器性能调优,在x86-64和ARM64系统上分别实现1.043倍和1.117倍的几何平均加速,显著优于专家调优和传统自动调优方法。

今日速览

序号标题来源日期主题推荐等级
1AutoPass: Evidence-Guided LLM Agents for Compiler Performance TuningarXiv2026-06-18AI-Agent高
2PACMS: Submodular Context Selection as a Pluggable Engine for LLM AgentsarXiv2026-06-18AI-Agent高

重点论文与技术动态

1. AutoPass: Evidence-Guided LLM Agents for Compiler Performance Tuning

一句话结论

AutoPass通过证据引导的LLM代理框架实现编译器性能调优,在x86-64和ARM64系统上分别实现1.043倍和1.117倍的几何平均加速,显著优于专家调优和传统自动调优方法。

核心内容

方法与数据

价值判断

摘要 Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for code compilation tasks, but applying them to runtime performance tuning is difficult due to complex microarchitectural effects and noisy runtime measurements. We present AutoPass, a multi-agent framework for compiler performance tuning that uses compiler and runtime evidence to guide LLM-generated optimization decisions. Rather than treating the compiler as a black box like prior auto-tuning schemes, AutoPass opens up the compiler to the LLM, enabling it to query compiler-internal optimization states and analyze the intermediate representation to orchestrate compiler options. The search process iteratively refines optimization configurations using measured runtime feedback to diagnose regressions and guide latency-improving edits. AutoPass operates in an inference-only, training-free setting and requires no offline training or task-specific fine-tuning, making it readily applicable to new benchmarks and platforms. We implement AutoPass on the LLVM compiler and evaluate it on server-grade x86-64 and embedded ARM64 systems. AutoPass outperforms expert-tuned heuristics and classical autotuning methods, achieving geometric-mean speedups of 1.043x and 1.117x over LLVM -O3 on x86-64 and ARM64, respectively.

2. PACMS: Submodular Context Selection as a Pluggable Engine for LLM Agents

一句话结论

PACMS提出了一种基于子模优化的上下文选择机制,作为LLM代理的可插拔引擎,能有效解决上下文窗口过载问题,避免传统按时间顺序截断导致的关键信息丢失。

核心内容

方法与数据

价值判断

摘要 Conversational and tool-using LLM agents operate over a context window that fills from several directions simultaneously. As a session proceeds, the agent accumulates user and assistant turns, entries drawn from a persistent memory store, and often largest of all, the verbatim outputs of tool calls such as file reads, search results, and API responses. Once the cumulative context exceeds the model's token budget, the framework must decide what to keep. The prevailing mechanism is recency truncation, sometimes paired with periodic summarization. This is topic-blind: a fact established early in a session is discarded simply because it is old, even when the current user query is about exactly that fact; conversely, verbose but irrelevant recent material is retained. Agents that must recall information across many turns, the defining case for memory, are precisely where recency truncation fails. Existing alternatives sit outside the agent's assembly step. Retrieval augmented generation fetches external documents into the prompt but does not arbitrate the agent's \emph{already-present} pooled context. Context-compression methods reduce token count by rewriting or pruning text, but operate query-blind and lossily. Neither treats memory entries, conversation turns, and tool outputs as a single candidate pool to be selected from by relevance at the moment the prompt is assembled.
  1. AutoPass: Evidence-Guided LLM Agents for Compiler Performance Tuning AutoPass通过证据引导的LLM代理框架实现编译器性能调优,在x86-64和ARM64系统上分别实现1.043倍和1.117倍的几何平均加速,显著优于专家调优和传统自动调优方法。

  2. PACMS: Submodular Context Selection as a Pluggable Engine for LLM Agents PACMS提出了一种基于子模优化的上下文选择机制,作为LLM代理的可插拔引擎,能有效解决上下文窗口过载问题,避免传统按时间顺序截断导致的关键信息丢失。