跳到正文
Jones Ray

ScholarPulse 日报 2026-08-25

2026-08-25 学术简报:2 篇。候选人搜索应被建模为需求工程任务,系统通过交互式澄清、验证与证据核查显著提升候选覆盖和召回。

今日速览

序号标题来源日期主题推荐等级
1An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate SourcingarXiv2026-08-24RAG高
2InjecMEM: Memory Injection Attack on LLM Agent Memory SystemsarXiv2026-08-24RAG高

重点论文与技术动态

1. An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcing

一句话结论

候选人搜索应被建模为需求工程任务,系统通过交互式澄清、验证与证据核查显著提升候选覆盖和召回。

核心内容

方法与数据

价值判断

摘要 Finding people from a natural-language description (``ML engineers transitioning to research roles in biotech'') is increasingly delegated to LLM agents and framed as information retrieval. We argue that it is fundamentally a requirements engineering task: such a request is an under-determined requirement with implicit constraints, many valid answers, and no acceptance criterion, so useful answers require eliciting, validating, and verifying the requirement before search can matter. We present \sys{}, to our knowledge the first interactive, requirements-driven candidate-sourcing agent (it elicits, validates, retrieves, and verifies a vague people-request into a justified slate through bounded elicitation, workflow templates, a two-stage commit protocol, and bidirectional termination guards) and \bench{}, a benchmark that runs the requirements lifecycle (criteria-anchored validation, multi-model evidence-grounded oracle construction, and cost-aware verification). Across $21$ systems and all $691$ requirements, \sys{} dominates breadth ($100%$ coverage at $2.5\times$ the yield) and is \emph{near-orthogonal} to the field, with $90%$ of the people it returns are surfaced by \emph{none} of $20$ strong LLM-plus-web baselines combined. Beyond breadth, an evidence-grounded judging of every system shows \sys{} \emph{recalls} the most relevant real people: $0.241$ of the union pool, $1.9\times$ the next system, with a bootstrap $95%$ interval disjoint from every baseline. \sys{} is thus the strongest \emph{sourcing} engine (the deepest real, reachable candidate pool), while precision-ranking LLMs serve as~complementary verifiers.

2. InjecMEM: Memory Injection Attack on LLM Agent Memory Systems

一句话结论

InjecMEM 证明单次交互即可污染代理记忆,使后续相关查询被检索触发并偏向攻击者指定输出。

核心内容

方法与数据

价值判断

摘要 Memory is becoming a default subsystem in deployed LLM agents to provide persistent personalization and continuity. This naturally prompts a question: will memory system introduce new vulnerabilities into agents? Thus we propose InjecMEM, a novel memory injection attack paradigm that requires only a single interaction (no read/edit access to memory store) to steer later responses of related queries toward a pre-specified output. Guided by the retrieval-then-generate mechanism of memory systems, we craft the injection with a retriever-agnostic anchor and an adversarial command. The anchor contains high-recall topical cues so that downstream retrieval consistently associates the record with the target topic. The command is a short sequence optimized to remain effective under uncertain fused contexts, variable placements, and long prompts so that it reliably steers outputs once retrieved. We learn the command via gradient-based coordinate search, averaging over synthetic prompt templates and insertion positions, and extend it to joint optimization across backbones to study transfer. Evaluated across multiple memory systems and backbone models, InjecMEM achieves reliable topic-conditioned retrieval and targeted generation, remains effective under memory drift, and leaves non-target queries unaffected. Our results underscore the need to harden memory systems and provide a reproducible framework for studying agent memory.